mikshaw
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ce47/3ce47e985ab15a24d340f7ee67fb1117182cdde6" alt=""
Group: Members
Posts: 4856
Joined: July 2004 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: Sep. 10 2004,00:35 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
Gimp 2.0 is sa-weeeet. I was just playing with it for a while, and haven't run into any problems yet. some of the filters and scripts cause my system to slow down a bit, so users with small amounts of ram may need patience...this is gimp itself, though...nothing to do with the way the extension was built.
One thing I cannot understand, though.... I removed the locale directory (21mb uncompressed) and zipped it back up just to see what the difference would be, and my new archive was 29MB. This is using gzip -9 How the heck did you get it down to 21mb in the first place, never mind also having the locale directory included? Is there a higher gzip compression than 9? I didn't remove all the base directories for the test, but I can't see how this would make that much difference.
-------------- http://www.tldp.org/LDP/intro-linux/html/index.html
|