^thehatsrule^
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
Group: Members
Posts: 3275
Joined: July 2006 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: Oct. 25 2006,22:33 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
Having devices only mountable as root is a security precaution I suppose... user 'dsl' has sudo access anyways so I don't see any problem. This isn't just for usb partitions in particular either. However, you can create a directory that's owned by user 'dsl' i.e. in /cdrom - or another point that is already mounted writeable by root (depending on setup).
Also, what exactly is a "reversed-usb-zip type installation"? usb-hdd?
|