Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

Mini-ITX Boards Sale, Fanless BareBones Mini-ITX, Bootable 1G DSL USBs, 533MHz Fanless PC <-- SALE $200 each!
Get The Official Damn Small Linux Book. DSL Market , Great VPS hosting provided by Tektonic
Pages: (4) </ 1 2 3 [4] >/

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: saving settings dsl sessions/usb< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
lucky13 Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 1478
Joined: Feb. 2007
Posted: Mar. 26 2008,04:00 QUOTE

It's not really that surprising. People don't change the Windows defaults so that media won't automatically mount/start and many virus scanners can't be set to automatically scan any new media upon insertion. What freaks me out is the number of people I see popping USB drives into library computers without a second thought, even right after a previous user removed a device. I always wonder how many of them go home or to other computers and pop them right in without any scan.

--------------
"It felt kind of like having a pitbull terrier on my rear end."
-- meo (copyright(c)2008, all rights reserved)
Back to top
Profile PM WEB 
^thehatsrule^ Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 3275
Joined: July 2006
Posted: Mar. 26 2008,04:57 QUOTE

Quote (lucky13 @ Mar. 25 2008,17:12)
Quote
lucky13: I suppose the "safest" bet would be to save your login details in cookies

That's not very safe and still susceptible to man in the middle attacks, which one should expect in any insecure environment like an Internet cafe. What applies to wifi can be just as easy on any sniffed network. If you're unsure about how trustworthy any particular computer or network is, why should you assume or hope that your web traffic is unmonitored or not sniffed?
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=651
http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/33207/108/

Hence the quotes. It can be considered somewhat safer to some trivial degree since, in most cases, I think the password would not be visible.
Back to top
Profile PM 
curaga Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 2163
Joined: Feb. 2007
Posted: Mar. 26 2008,16:09 QUOTE

I would believe there is a way around sniffing: have your own server in a trusted environment, and whenever you go to a cafe, use your server as a proxy while encapsulating all traffic between your server and DSL with ssh.

Having fat32 can get your files infected with windows viruses. But, as with the md5 limited set of possibilities causing a clash, security comes through the levels of packaging. Your files can get infected. But having them get infected, while also keeping their signatures recognizable as the files they are, and also keeping their structure intact so they still are usable, is way more rare. As the main file is a cloop pack, altering something would trigger a warning either on load or when trying to read from the changed block.


--------------
There's no such thing as life. Those mean little jocks invented it ;)
-
Windows is not a virus. A virus does something!
Back to top
Profile PM 
lucky13 Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 1478
Joined: Feb. 2007
Posted: Mar. 26 2008,16:57 QUOTE

Quote
I would believe there is a way around sniffing: have your own server in a trusted environment, and whenever you go to a cafe, use your server as a proxy while encapsulating all traffic between your server and DSL with ssh.

Or use VPN. There's a new OpenVPN extension in testing but I haven't tried it yet because my wireless card is too hamstrung in DSL for it to be of much use to me.

I want to look at that extension more closely because I don't recall TUN/TAP being in the config and I just extracted the extension and didn't see those modules in it. Hmmm...


--------------
"It felt kind of like having a pitbull terrier on my rear end."
-- meo (copyright(c)2008, all rights reserved)
Back to top
Profile PM WEB 
^thehatsrule^ Offline





Group: Members
Posts: 3275
Joined: July 2006
Posted: Mar. 27 2008,15:36 QUOTE

Note of interest: after taking a glance at a few links that was posted here, I decided to see whether these forums had https support. Using the same address, but changing the protocol showed that this site does have support for it, but is not configured properly(?) to use it (expired cert, http links, Firefox says information is partially encrypted, etc.), which is a given since there are no links that point to it.
Back to top
Profile PM 
19 replies since Mar. 25 2008,13:04 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

Pages: (4) </ 1 2 3 [4] >/
reply to topic new topic new poll
Quick Reply: saving settings dsl sessions/usb

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code