Caspar_s
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
Group: Members
Posts: 105
Joined: Jan. 2005 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: April 14 2005,20:50 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
Quote (mikshaw @ April 14 2005,10:46) | It's probably a better idea to put swap on a harddrive rather than removeable media...it's faster and more reliable. |
Not to mention a swap will eat your flash stick...
Sandisk Ultra 2 has 300 000 write cycle endurance... fine for installing, upgrading etc, but not good for constantly writing like swap would.
Sandisk Extreme has 1 million. I guess if it didn't cost you too much and you don't mind replacing it, go for it, but ram would be a better investment...
Haha, just looked at your system specs... I don't think you NEED swap! 2gb ram could run the full knoppix in ram.
|