cbagger01
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
Group: Members
Posts: 4264
Joined: Oct. 2003 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: Jan. 07 2006,04:05 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
There is a slight performance hit from using a compressed filesystem. If you have a Pentium 2 or newer computer, the performance hit is minimal. For older computers, a full hd install will yield a noticable performance improvement. Even so, the compressed filesystem is quite usable.
You cannot boot a full hd installed system with the "toram" option. "toram" loads the compressed filesystem into RAM. A full hd install has no compressed filesystem image.
|