cbagger01
Group: Members
Posts: 4264
Joined: Oct. 2003 |
|
Posted: Feb. 21 2006,18:48 |
|
[quote=Guest,Feb. 21 2006,03:22][/quote] I take offense to your characterization of Merriam-Webster's Dictionary as an "elementary school" dictionary.
A relative of mine once worked for M-W as a proofreader and I can assure you that they take their work VERY seriously and are highly regarded in the USA.
Now if my aunt happened to be reading this forum, she might take offense with your post since it is an indirect criticism of her work and the work of her colleagues.
Does this make your comment rude?
Not in my world.
It seems obvious to me that you were trying to make the point that Oxford was a "real" dictionary by comparison and you were not trying to offend someone.
So either everyone who has ever written anything in public that might offend a person who potentially might read it is "rude" - your interpretation
Or intentional discourtesy directed at someone, e.g. insults and attacks on a person, is "rude" - my interpretation
Regardless, it appears that we will have to agree to disagree on the subject. I have nothing more to offer.
PS:
If you are waiting for me to apologize to an unspecified list of people (who refuse to read the getting started document and then post help questions that have already been answered 50 or more times) that I supposedly offended due to a humorous reference in a post to the developers of DSL, you are going to be waiting for a looong time, buddy.
|