kubera
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: June 2006 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: June 14 2006,01:45 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
Quote (John @ June 03 2006,01:22) | I believe they have StrongARM processors, so its not compatible. |
Here's the question: Are the StrongARM processors not DSL-compatible because nobody's yet ported it, or because it's un-port-able?
I think I may have a couple of old StrongARM PDAs gathering dust in drawers that I'd be willing to find new batteries for and maybe donate to the cause if it's simply a lack of 'test subjects' in the community. I'd have to check to make sure they're still viable.
Of course, I suppose when discussing DSL-ok processors, VIAble is probably a poor word choice.
Yeah, okay, I deserve to have something thrown at me for that one.
|