^thehatsrule^
Group: Members
Posts: 3275
Joined: July 2006 |
|
Posted: Sep. 21 2007,15:32 |
|
Heh, instead of "lite" I was thinking of terms more like "unrar," like using "7zr"
This brings me to ask a general question about .uci/.tar.gz extensions, regarding the use of /opt/bin: afaik they were added to PATH for the use of symlinks. Should this be kept for symlinks only? What should the standard be?
If not only for symlinks, this rules over the traditional /opt/packagename structure... if this is the case, then probably renaming the current extension without modifying its contents should be fine then.
EDIT: this seems to be getting long and a bit off this thread. If there are no simple answers and it gets any longer I think it should be moved to another.
|