dslrgm
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
Group: Members
Posts: 84
Joined: July 2007 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: July 31 2007,13:08 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
I agree that my skill level is moderate. I have a dozen Centos based systems here. Servers of different sorts, and two notebooks running Centos 5.
DSL is of interest to me as a low-overhead LInux that I will may use for special projects, and potentially as a NAS solution I don't know if I will use it long-term as a desktop. I have too much invested in Centos, and a number of my production systems pretty much have to be Centos, or pay Redhat big bucks I do not have.
But I am getting into low-power system design, and here DSL is attractive. I am looking at different drive options. Compact Flash is interesting, but we all know that it is not good for constant writing. But I am seeing the Hitachi 4Gb microdrive for around $25 on ebay, much less than I can get 4Gb CF from ecost.com. And not much more in power drain. I definitely can go a 2-drive approach (IDE-CF dual adapters are only pennies more than single drive adapters) too if I need the capacity (8Gb midrodrives are still expensive).
I am also looking at just using 2.5" drives. The 1.8" drives were dropped as they all seem to have ZIF connectors, and micro-ITX systems do not and adapters are very pricey.
Memory is always a concern. Not just for cost, but also power demands. So again, DSL over throwing 512Mb or more memory at a problem.
|