lucky13
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
Group: Members
Posts: 1478
Joined: Feb. 2007 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: July 31 2007,15:05 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
DSL is much better suited for desktop than for servers and isn't enterprise-level like RH/CentOS. I don't even know why you're trying to use it for a production system, much less balancing DSL versus Red Hat at all. Any distro can be "low overhead" if it's set up properly -- especially those suited for use in server environments instead of desktop live CDs.
If you have experience and are competent with CentOS, you should be able to handle the re-partitioning scheme you want without asking the kinds of questions you have.
-------------- "It felt kind of like having a pitbull terrier on my rear end." -- meo (copyright(c)2008, all rights reserved)
|