Jason W
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db3d/3db3d59337ccc8bc3ec15645b7ab368bce77b85a" alt="Offline"
Group: Members
Posts: 260
Joined: Nov. 2006 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd3a8/cd3a84c67c9ea531b591a3a8b33552269a04250f" alt="" |
Posted: Mar. 02 2007,03:00 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c44/d6c44952b272c7945ab6f79c02e4aece27e637ca" alt="QUOTE" |
Mutella works perfectly for me, has a nice friendly web interface, and it connects to the network in a second or two. Two of the three web caches in the default mutellarc file have a score of 100 on the jonatkins site and the third has a score of 95. Maybe the issue Zucca is dealing with is location. I do not know how much location plays a part in choosing web caches, but for me it makes a big difference in choosind Debian servers. Internap is like greased lightning near Atlanta, but when I am in the mountains, the server in North Carolina is much better. Maybe what entry works fast in one location doesn't work as fast as in another, and a few folks may have to add different web caches. But I think the default entries are good. Just a thought.
|