Joined: Oct. 2003
||Posted: June 01 2006,22:34
clacker, I will try this setup.
I am not happy with
cp -rp /etc /ramdisk/holder/etc_copy
That will use up alot of inodes which I was hoping to avoid.
If unionfs has the same or more impacts, via inode use, as mkwriteable then the benefits are much reduced from what I was hoping for.
I am planing for a more standard unionfs setup on dsl-n.
But seeing what JB4X4 had posted earlier, I was hoping for an extremely minimal setup for dsl, ie., minimal inode/ramdisk use with no copying to ramdisk. This would really help the ultra low end machines which has always been our target. Maybe I am too optimistic